InfoBytes Blog
Filter
Subscribe to our InfoBytes Blog weekly newsletter and other publications for news affecting the financial services industry.
OFAC settles with Danish company for routing prohibited financial transactions though a U.S. bank
On December 30, the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) announced a more than $4.3 million settlement with a multinational Danish manufacturer to resolve allegations that its wholly owned United Arab Emirates (UAE)-based subsidiary directed customers in Iran, Syria, and Sudan to make payments to its bank account at the UAE branch of a U.S. financial institution. According to OFAC’s enforcement release, between November 2013 and August 2017, the subsidiary sold products to customers in Sudan, Syria, and Iran. Customers were instructed to remit payments to at least three accounts at banks located in the UAE, including the parent company’s U.S. branch account. OFAC further contended that the subsidiary used third-party payers to make five transfers (disguising the originator or beneficiary of the transactions) from its U.S. branch account to parties in Syria and Iran, which prevented the bank’s transactional screen filters from stopping the payments. The total value of all the transfers was roughly $16,959,683, OFAC said, claiming that by causing a U.S. financial institution to facilitate prohibited financial transactions and export financial services, the parent company violated the Iranian, Syrian, and Sudanese sanctions regulations.
While OFAC found no evidence that the parent company willfully engaged third-party payers to evade sanctions, it determined that the subsidiary “was aware since at least 2011 that using a U.S. financial institution to send or receive payments related to sanctioned jurisdictions could be prohibited.” Moreover, the subsidiary allegedly received communications from the parent company and various financial institutions regarding concerns flagged in its banking activity but continued to use the U.S. branch account to collect payments from customers in sanctioned jurisdictions. These alleged violations, OFAC stated, occurred primarily due to deficiencies in the parent company’s global sanctions compliance program.
OFAC noted that while the parent company disclosed the alleged violations, the agency was already in possession of the relevant information and therefore the submission did not qualify as a voluntary self-disclosure. However, OFAC considered various mitigating factors, including that the parent company had not received a penalty notice from OFAC in the preceding five years, and the parent company took quick action to determine the root causes of the alleged conduct and undertook significant remedial measures to prevent future violations.
Providing context for the settlement, OFAC stated that the “enforcement action highlights the risks to multinational companies, including to non-U.S. entities, that involve the U.S. financial system in commercial activity involving an OFAC- sanctioned country, region, or person,” and emphasized that “[c]ommercial activity that might not otherwise violate OFAC regulations—such as the sale of non-U.S. goods by a non-U.S. person to an entity in an OFAC-sanctioned country—can nonetheless cause a violation when the financial transactions related to that activity are processed through or involve U.S. financial institutions.”
OFAC issues preliminary guidance on price cap policy implementation
On December 30, the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) announced preliminary guidance on the implementation of the price cap policy for petroleum products of Russian Federation origin. As previously covered by InfoBytes, in November, OFAC published a Determination Pursuant to Executive Order (E.O.) 14071 stating that the prohibitions of E.O. 14071 apply to U.S. persons providing covered services (including (i) trading/commodities brokering; (ii) financing; (iii) shipping; (iv) insurance, including reinsurance and protection and indemnity; (v) flagging; and (vi) customs brokering) as they relate to the maritime transport of Russian Federation crude oil, provided, however, that such covered services are authorized if the Russian oil is purchased at or below the price cap. OFAC also published guidance on the implementation of a policy for crude oil of Russian Federation origin to provide an overview of the determination and the price cap. OFAC noted that it anticipates publishing final, combined guidance for both Russian oil and Russian petroleum products before February 5.
FinCEN data reveals Russian oligarchs’ financial activity
On December 22, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) issued a Financial Trend Analysis on the financial activity of Russian oligarchs. In the analysis, FinCEN examined Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) reports from March 2022 to October 2022 involving Russian oligarchs, high-ranking officials, and sanctioned individuals. FinCEN identified 454 reports detailing suspicious activity and reported that some of the trends in the data by Russian oligarchs included: (i) the movement of funds around the start of the invasion of Ukraine in February 2022; (ii) the purchase of high-value goods or property in 2022; and (iii) based on the movement of funds from accounts in Russia to other countries, an indication of potential changes in longstanding oligarch-linked financial flows related to U.S. properties and companies. FinCEN noted that 78 percent of the 454 BSA reports were filed by U.S.-based depository institutions. Other types of financial institutions—such as holding companies or financial technology companies—submitted roughly 19 percent of reports, mainly on suspicious electronic funds transfers or wire transfers and suspicions concerning the source of funds.
OFAC sanctions Iranian officials
On December 21, the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) announced sanctions pursuant to Executive Order 13553 against the prosecutor general and key military and paramilitary officials in Iran, as well as a company manufacturing and providing Iran’s Law Enforcement Forces with anti-riot equipment. According to OFAC, the designations target the senior official overseeing the prosecution of protestors, as well as leaders of military and paramilitary organizations accused of violently cracking down and detaining protestors, and a company that procures and provides security forces with tools of suppression. As a result of the sanctions, all property and interests in property belonging to the sanctioned persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction are blocked and must be reported to OFAC. Additionally, “any entities that are owned, directly or indirectly, 50 percent or more by one or more blocked persons are also blocked.” U.S. persons are also generally prohibited from engaging in any dealings involving the property or interests in property of blocked or designated persons. Persons that engage in certain transactions with the individuals designated today may themselves be exposed to designation. Additionally, OFAC warned that “any foreign financial institution that knowingly facilitates a significant transaction or provides significant financial services for any of the persons designated today could be subject to U.S. sanctions.”
CFTC orders respondent to pay $6.5 million for CEA violations
On December 20, the CFTC announced a settlement with a registered futures commission merchant (respondent) for allegedly violating the Commodity Exchange Act, Commission regulations, and Bank Secrecy Act compliance requirements. According to the CFTC, the respondent allegedly “failed to implement an adequate anti-money laundering [] program, particularly as applied to a futures and options trading account controlled by [a customer],” and “failed to implement risk-based limits concerning trading by [a customer].” The CFTC also alleged supervisory and recordkeeping failures stemming from the inadequate anti-money laundering program. The respondent is ordered to pay a $6.5 million civil money penalty and undertake certain remedial measures relating to the violations.
OFAC publishes illicit drug trade sanctions regulations
On December 19, the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) announced it is adding regulations to implement Executive Order (E.O.) 14059 of December 15, 2021, Imposing Sanctions on Foreign Persons Involved in the Global Illicit Drug Trade. As previously covered by InfoBytes, the E.O. was issued due to the threat of drug trafficking into the U.S of illicit drugs, which “is causing the deaths of tens of thousands of Americans annually, as well as countless more non-fatal overdoses with their own tragic human toll.” Among other provisions, the E.O authorizes the Treasury Department to impose certain sanctions on any foreign person determined to have engaged in activities contributing to the international proliferation of drugs or to have knowingly received property derived from drug proliferation. According to the notice, the regulations are being published in abbreviated form to provide immediate guidance, and OFAC intends to add a more comprehensive set of regulations, which may include additional interpretive guidance and definitions, general licenses, and other regulatory provisions.
FCA fines UK bank £108 million over AML controls
On December 9, the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) fined a UK bank more than £107.7 million for allegedly maintaining inadequate anti-money laundering (AML) controls at its business banking division. The bank’s AML controls and attempts to correct the problems were inadequate according to the FCA and “created a prolonged and severe risk of money laundering and financial crime.” The FCA further claimed that these alleged “serious and persistent gaps” prevented the bank from adequately overseeing more than 560,000 business customers between December 2012 and October 2017. According to the FCA, due to the alleged deficiencies, the bank was purportedly unable to verify information provided by customers about their business intentions and was unable to properly monitor the money that customers claimed would be going through their accounts compared with what was actually being deposited. The FCA’s investigation also identified several other mismanaged accounts that left the bank vulnerable to money laundering risk and found examples where the bank failed to promptly address “red flags” associated with suspicious activity. As a result, more than £298 million was routed through the bank before the accounts were closed.
The FCA noted, however, that the fine was reduced from nearly £154 million (a 30 percent discount) due to the bank not disputing the findings. The bank, which has fully cooperated with the FCA’s investigation, released a statement emphasizing that while it took action to address the AML issues once they were identified, it accepts that its “AML framework at the time should have been stronger.” The bank has since implemented significant changes to address these issues by overhauling its financial crime technology, systems, and processes.
OFAC announces Russia-related sanctions
On December 9, the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control announced sanctions against 18 entities related to the Russian Federation’s financial services sector. According to OFAC, the sanctions are taken in conjunction with the Department of State, which is concurrently designating a prominent oligarch in Russia, his network, and more than 40 additional persons linked to the Russian government as part of the U.S. government’s efforts to further limit Russia's ability to fund its war against Ukraine. As a result of the sanctions, all property and interests in property belonging to the sanctioned persons that are in the U.S. or in the possession or control of U.S. persons are blocked and must be reported to OFAC. Further, “any entities that are owned, directly or indirectly, 50 percent or more by one or more blocked persons are also blocked.” U.S. persons are prohibited from engaging in any dealings involving the property or interests in property of blocked or designated persons, unless exempt or authorized by a general or specific OFAC license.
OFAC issues sanctions, GL, and FAQ on countering narcotics
On December 14, the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) announced sanctions pursuant to Executive Order 14059 against an individual for being involved in activities or transactions that materially contributed to, or pose a significant risk of materially contributing to, the international proliferation of illicit drugs or their means of production. According to OFAC, the designated individual is the leader of a Dominican Republic-based criminal organization engaged in various illicit activities, and his organization controls several drug trafficking routes into the U.S. As a result of the sanctions, all property and interests in property belonging to the sanctioned persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction are blocked and must be reported to OFAC. Additionally, “any entities that are owned, directly or indirectly, 50 percent or more by one or more blocked persons are also blocked.” U.S. persons are also generally prohibited from engaging in any dealings involving the property or interests in property of blocked or designated persons.
The same day, OFAC issued Counter Terrorism General License (GL) 21A, Authorizing Limited Safety and Environmental Transactions Involving Certain Vessel. GL 21 authorizes all activities otherwise prohibited by the Global Terrorism Sanctions Regulations (GTSR), 31 CFR part 594, that are ordinarily incident and necessary to the limited safety and environmental activities described in paragraph (a) of GL 21A involving certain blocked persons and vessels through January 14, 2023. Additionally, OFAC announced it is amending a Counter Terrorism Frequently Asked Question 1097, which clarifies GL 21A.
FinCEN issues proposed beneficial ownership information access and safeguards rulemaking
On December 15, FinCEN issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to implement provisions of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA) that govern the access to and protection of beneficial ownership information. (See also FinCEN fact sheet here.) The NPRM follows a final rule issued by FinCEN at the end of September (effective January 1, 2024), which establishes a beneficial ownership information reporting requirement (Reporting Rule) and requires most corporations, limited liability companies, and other entities created in or registered to do business in the U.S. to report information about their beneficial owners to FinCEN. (Covered by InfoBytes here.)
In accordance with CTA requirements related to beneficial ownership information access and safeguard provisions, FinCEN’s NPRM proposes regulations for establishing who may request beneficial ownership information, how the information must be secured, and non-compliance penalties. Specifically, the proposal would limit the disclosure of beneficial information to “[f]ederal agencies engaged in national security, intelligence, or law enforcement activities; state, local, and Tribal law enforcement agencies with court authorization; financial institutions with customer due diligence requirements and regulators supervising them for compliance with such requirements; foreign law enforcement agencies, prosecutors, judges, and other agencies that meet specific criteria; and Treasury officers and employees under certain circumstances.” The proposal would also require authorized recipients to maintain security and confidentiality protocols that align with the scope of access and use provisions.
Among other things, the NPRM addresses aspects of the secure, non-public beneficial ownership database that is currently in development, and specifies when and how reporting companies may report FinCEN identifiers tied to entities. Under the proposal, foreign requesters would be required to make their requests for beneficial ownership information through intermediary federal agencies, and financial institutions would only be allowed to request this information from FinCEN for purposes of complying with customer due diligence (CDD) requirements and only after receiving consent from the reporting company to which the information pertains.
Comments on the NPRM are due by February 14, 2023. FinCEN explained that this is the second of three rulemakings planned to implement the CTA. The third rulemaking, which will revise FinCEN’s CDD rule, will occur no later than one year after the effective date of the Reporting Rule.