InfoBytes Blog
Filter
Subscribe to our InfoBytes Blog weekly newsletter and other publications for news affecting the financial services industry.
FDIC and FinCEN launch Tech Sprint to help digital identity proofing
On January 11, the FDIC’s technology lab, FDiTech, and FinCEN announced the launch of a Tech Sprint challenging participants “to develop solutions for financial institutions and regulators to help measure the effectiveness of digital identity proofing—the process used to collect, validate, and verify information about a person.” According to the Tech Sprint program, Measuring the Effectiveness of Digital Identity Proofing for Digital Financial Services, solutions developed from this Tech Sprint will inform future FDIC, FinCEN, and industry-led efforts, plans, and programs to: (i) increase efficiency and account security; (ii) decrease fraud and other forms of identity-related crime, money laundering and terrorist financing; and (iii) foster customer confidence in the digital banking environment. According to the agencies, digital identity proofing is “challenged by the proliferation of compromised personally identifiable information, the increasing use of synthetic identities, and the presence of multiple, varied approaches for identity proofing.” The FDIC and FinCEN will open registration in the coming weeks, and stakeholders interested in participating will have approximately two weeks to submit applications.
Agencies adjust civil penalties to account for inflation
Recently, the CFPB, CFTC, FDIC, FinCen, FHFA, and OCC provided notice in the Federal Register regarding adjustments to the maximum civil money penalties due to inflation pursuant to the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act of 1990, as amended by the Federal Civil Penalties Inflation Adjustment Act Improvements Act of 2015. Each notice or final rule (see CFPB here, CFTC here, FDIC here, FinCen here, FHFA here, and OCC here) adjusts the maximum amounts of civil money penalties and provides a chart reflecting the inflation-adjusted maximum amounts associated with the penalty tiers for particular types of violations within each regulator’s jurisdiction. The OCC’s adjusted civil money penalty amounts are applicable to penalties assessed on or after January 12. The new CFPB, CFTC, FDIC, and FHFA civil money penalty amounts are applicable to penalties assessed on or after January 15. FinCEN's adjusted civil money penalty amounts are effective January 24.
FinCEN issues final rule replacing obsolete BSA civil penalty regulations
On December 23, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) published a final rule amending the Bank Secrecy Act civil penalty regulations concerning requirements for reporting foreign financial accounts and transactions with foreign financial agencies. Specifically, the final rule removes civil penalty language that was made obsolete by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004’s enactment of statutory revisions to the computation of a civil money penalty, which included provisions for increasing the maximum penalty for willful violations. The final rule took effect immediately.
FinCEN says wildlife trafficking threatens financial system integrity
On December 20, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) issued a Financial Threat Analysis concerning suspicious activity reports (SARs) related to wildlife trafficking trend information identified in Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) data. FinCEN identified wildlife trafficking as a major transnational organized crime involving “the illicit trade of protected animals, animal parts, and derivatives thereof, including procurement, transport, and distribution, in violation of international or domestic law, and money laundering related to this activity.” The proceeds related to wildlife trafficking is estimated to be between $7 and $23 billion annually. According to FinCEN, traffickers damage the integrity of the financial system. FinCEN also stated that financial institutions play a critical role in “identifying wildlife trafficking and protecting the U.S. financial system from associated illicit finance through compliance with their BSA obligations.”
FinCEN stated that the issues with wildlife trafficking are: “(1) its strong association with corruption and transnational criminal organizations, two of FinCEN’s national anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism priorities published in June 2021; (2) a need to enhance reporting and analysis of related illicit financial flows; and, (3) wildlife trafficking’s contribution to biodiversity loss, damage to fragile ecosystems, and the increased likelihood of spreading of zoonotic diseases.”
FinCEN, OCC take action against bank for AML violations
On December 16, FinCEN announced an $8 million civil money penalty against a Texas-based bank for violating the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) and its implementing regulations from at least 2015 to 2019 by allegedly failing to implement and maintain an effective, reasonably designed anti-money laundering (AML) program. According to the consent order, the bank allegedly failed to report hundreds of suspicious transactions to FinCEN involving illegal financial activity by its customers and continued to knowingly process the transactions after becoming aware that certain customers were subjects of criminal investigations. According to FinCEN, the bank’s violations “caused millions of dollars in suspicious transactions to go unreported to FinCEN in a timely and accurate manner, including transactions connected to tax evasion, illegal gambling, money laundering, and other financial crimes.”
The same day, the OCC announced a $1 million civil money penalty against the bank for “related violations.” According to the OCC’s separate but coordinated investigation with FinCEN, the bank allegedly failed to adopt and implement a BSA/AML system of internal controls to assure ongoing compliance with the BSA and its implementing regulations. According to the consent order, the bank’s alleged internal control deficiencies, and other failures in its BSA/AML compliance program, “resulted in the failure to investigate and disposition alerts and violations of the suspicious activity reporting requirements.” FinCEN's announcement noted that, “[a]s many of the facts and circumstances underlying the OCC’s civil penalty also form the basis of FinCEN’s Consent Order, FinCEN agreed to credit the $1 million civil penalty imposed by the OCC, and “[t]aken together, [the bank] will pay a total of $8 million to the U.S. Treasury as a penalty for its violations, with $7 million representing FinCEN’s penalty and $1 million representing the OCC’s penalty.”
FinCEN seeks comments on updating AML/CFT regime
On December 14, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) issued a request for information (RFI) in the Federal Register seeking comments from regulated entities; state, local, and Tribal governments; law enforcement; regulators; and other consumers of Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) data, on ways to redevelop the anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) regime in the U.S. According to the announcement, FinCEN intends to collect comments regarding ways to modernize risk-based AML/CFT regulations and guidance so that they protect U.S. national security in a cost-effective and efficient manner. Additionally, the RFI “supports FinCEN’s efforts to conduct a formal review of BSA regulations and related guidance, which is required by Section 6216 of the Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020.”
As previously covered by InfoBytes, the Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2020 made numerous changes to the BSA, including amendments to the definition of “financial institution” to include a “person engaged in the trade of antiquities, including an advisor, consultant, or any other person who engages as a business in the solicitation or the sale of antiquities.” According to FinCEN, this “review will help FinCEN ensure that BSA regulations and guidance continue to safeguard the U.S. financial system from threats to national security posed by various forms of financial crime, and that BSA reporting and recordkeeping requirements continue to be highly useful in countering financial crime.” This review will also permit the agency “to identify regulations and guidance that are outdated, redundant, or otherwise do not promote a risk-based AML/CFT compliance regime for financial institutions, or that do not conform with U.S. commitments to meet international AML/CFT standards.” The findings of the review will be reported to Congress, and will include administrative and legislative recommendations. Comments are due by February 14, 2022.
FinCEN extends FBAR filing deadline for certain individuals
On December 9, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) issued Notice 2021-1 to further extend the time for certain Report of Foreign Bank and Financial Accounts (FBAR) filings in light of the agency’s March 2016 notice of proposed rulemaking, which proposed to revise the Bank Secrecy Act’s implementing regulations regarding FBARs. (See previous InfoBytes coverage on the 2016 NPR here.) Specifically, one of the proposed amendments seeks to “expand and clarify the exemptions for certain U.S. persons with signature or other authority over foreign financial accounts,” but with no financial interest, as outlined in FinCEN Notice 2020-1 issued December 9, 2020. FinCEN noted that because the proposal has not been finalized, it is extending the filing due date to April 15, 2023, for individuals who previously qualified for a filing due date extension under Notice 2020-1. All other individuals must submit FBAR filings by April 15, 2022.
FinCEN issues NPRM on beneficial ownership
On December 7, FinCEN issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) implementing the beneficial ownership information reporting provisions of the Corporate Transparency Act (CTA). As previously covered by InfoBytes, the CTA is included within the Anti-Money Laundering Act of 2021, which was enacted in January as part of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021. The proposed rule implements the reporting requirements under the CTA and “reflects FinCEN’s careful consideration of public comments received in response to its April advance notice of proposed rulemaking on the same topic.” (Covered by InfoBytes here.) Among other things, the NPRM addresses who must report beneficial ownership information, when to report it, and what information they must provide. According to FinCEN, gathering “this information and providing access to law enforcement, financial institutions, and other authorized users will diminish the ability of malign actors to hide, move, and enjoy the proceeds of illicit activities.” Treasury Deputy Secretary Wally Adeyemo released a statement noting that Treasury, through the public comments gathered from the NPRM, intends to “develop a regulatory approach that will safeguard the integrity of our markets and root out corruption in American real estate.” The comment period ends 60 days after publication in the Federal Register.
FinCEN issues ANPRM to curb real estate-related illicit finance
On December 6, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) issued an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking (ANPRM) seeking comments on potential requirements under the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA) to address vulnerabilities in the U.S. real estate market to money laundering and other illicit activity. Systemic money laundering vulnerabilities in this space, FinCEN cautioned, present opportunities for corrupt officials and illicit actors to launder criminal proceeds through the purchase of real estate and threaten U.S. national security and the integrity of the U.S. financial system. FinCEN stressed that, because of the real estate market’s opacity and gaps in industry regulation, “the U.S. real estate market continues to be used as a vehicle for money laundering and can involve businesses and professions that facilitate (even if unwittingly) acquisitions of real estate in the money laundering process.” Regulated financial institutions, such as banks that provide real estate transactions, are subject to federal anti-money laundering rules and are not as susceptible to money laundering because they must report suspicious activity to FinCEN, the agency stated. However, FinCEN reported that when real estate is purchased in other ways, beneficial ownership can be extremely difficult to trace. Currently FinCEN does not impose the BSA’s general recordkeeping and reporting requirements on persons involved in all-cash real estate transactions (although title insurance companies are subject to specific transaction reporting requirements through Geographic Targeting Orders—covered by InfoBytes here). To address these issues, the ANPRM seeks comments on ways to enhance the transparency of the U.S. residential and commercial real estate market on a nationwide basis while minimizing the burden on businesses. Comments are due within 60 days of publication in the Federal Register.
FinCEN issues environmental crimes notice
On November 18, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) issued a notice calling attention to the increase of environmental crimes and associated illicit financial activity. FinCEN emphasized that this trend is due to: (i) its strong association with corruption and transnational criminal organizations, two of FinCEN’s national anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism priorities; (ii) a need to enhance reporting and analysis of related illicit financial flows; and (iii) environmental crimes’ contribution to the climate crisis, including threatening ecosystems, decreasing biodiversity, and increasing carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. The notice also provided financial institutions with specific suspicious activity report filing instructions and outlined the likelihood of illicit financial activity associated with several types of environmental crimes.