InfoBytes Blog
Filter
Subscribe to our InfoBytes Blog weekly newsletter and other publications for news affecting the financial services industry.
District Court grants final approval in a FCRA case remanded by the 9th Circuit
On December 15, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California granted final approval of a plaintiff’s motion for preliminary approval in a class action settlement in a FCRA case. In a class action against a credit reporting agency (CRA) for allegedly violating FCRA by erroneously linking class members to criminals and terrorists with similar names in a database maintained by the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), the district court ruled that all class members had standing to assert their FCRA claims. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiffs and awarded punitive damages. As previously covered by InfoBytes, in February 2020, the 9th Circuit reduced the punitive damages award and affirmed the district court’s ruling that all class members had standing due to, among other things, the CRA’s alleged “reckless handling of information from OFAC,” which subjected class members to “a real risk of harm.” As previously covered by InfoBytes, in April 2020, the 9th Circuit granted a joint motion to stay the mandate pending the CRA’s filing of a petition for writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court. The Supreme Court granted the CRA’s petition for certiorari and reversed the 9th Circuit’s finding on standing, holding that the class members whose credit reports were not provided to third-party businesses did not suffer a concrete harm and thus did not have standing to assert their “reasonable procedures” claims under the FCRA. The Court also held that none of the class members had standing to pursue the disclosure claims under the FCRA because they had not “suffered a concrete harm.” The Ninth Circuit remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with the Supreme Court’s ruling.
The parties participated in a mediation and reached a class-wide settlement. The plaintiff moved for preliminary approval, which the district court granted on July 19. The settlement class is composed of two categories of individuals: (1) the 1,853 class members that the defendant CRA identified in its pre-trial stipulation as individuals for whom the defendant had delivered a credit report containing OFAC data to a third-party, and (2) class members from the remaining group of 6,332 individuals not identified in the stipulation who submit a claim demonstrating publication of OFAC data to a third-party during the class period. The Settlement agreement, among other things, requires the defendant to establish a settlement fund of $9 million, which includes attorney fees and costs.
OFAC settles with bank for alleged Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Sanctions Regulations violations
On July 15, the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) announced a $430,500 settlement with a subsidiary of a national bank for allegedly processing transactions in violation of the Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Sanctions Regulations. According to OFAC’s web notice, between May 2018 and July 2018, the bank allegedly processed 214 transactions totaling $155,189, in violation of OFAC’s Kingpin sanctions. Specifically, OFAC noted that the processed transactions were for an account whose supplemental card holder was designated in connection with illegal drug distribution and money laundering.
In arriving at the settlement amount of $430,500, OFAC considered various aggravating factors, including that the bank “is a large and sophisticated financial institution with a global presence,” and “conferred $155,189.42 in economic benefit to an account associated with a [person] who was designated for involvement in illegal drug distribution and money laundering.” OFAC also considered various mitigating factors, including that the bank cooperated with OFAC throughout the investigation, and has undertaken remedial measures intended to minimize the risk of recurrence of similar conduct.
Treasury clarifies impact of sanctions on agricultural commodities, agricultural equipment, or medicine relating to Russia
On July 14, the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued a Fact Sheet to clarify that the U.S. has not imposed sanctions on the production, manufacturing, sale, or transport of agricultural commodities, agricultural equipment, or medicine relating to Russia. Additionally, OFAC issued General License (GL) 6B to expand agricultural and medical authorizations to now cover transactions related to agricultural equipment that would normally be prohibited by the Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations. OFAC emphasized that U.S. sanctions on Russia issued in response to its war against Ukraine “do not stand in the way of agricultural and medical trade.” OFAC referred to guidance issued in April for more details on authorizations under U.S. sanctions related to agricultural and medical transactions, nongovernmental organization activities, and Covid-19 relief, among others, to support people impacted by Russia’s war (covered by InfoBytes here).
OFAC sanctions Mexican cartel facilitator
On July 11, the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) announced sanctions pursuant to the Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Designation Act against an individual engaged in the trafficking of high-caliber firearms from the U.S. to a Mexican drug organization. According to OFAC, the designated individual acted for or on behalf of a violent drug trafficking organization based in Mexico, which is responsible for a significant proportion of drugs trafficked into the U.S. OFAC further noted that the designation “is the result of ongoing efforts by U.S. agencies and the Government of Mexico to disrupt Mexican drug trafficking organizations’ procurement of weapons, including those sourced in the United States.” As a result of the sanctions, all property belonging to the sanctioned persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction are blocked and must be reported to OFAC. U.S. persons are also generally prohibited from engaging in any dealings involving the property of blocked or designated persons.
OFAC sanctions Iranian petrochemical network
On July 6, the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) announced sanctions pursuant to Executive Order 13846 against an international network of individuals and entities for facilitating the delivery and sale of hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of Iranian petroleum and petrochemical products from Iranian companies to East Asia through a web of Gulf-based front companies. The designations follow OFAC sanctions announced June 16 against a network of Iranian petrochemical producers, as well as front companies in the People’s Republic of China and the United Arab Emirates, working to support Iranian petrochemical sales (covered by InfoBytes here). As a result, all property and interests in property of the sanctioned persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction are blocked and must be reported to OFAC, as well as any entities owned 50 percent or more by such persons. U.S. persons are also generally prohibited from entering into transactions with the sanctioned persons. Additionally, OFAC warned that “any foreign financial institution that knowingly facilitates a significant transaction for any of the individuals or entities designated today could be subject to U.S. sanctions.”
OFAC amends Venezuela-related general license
On July 7, the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control issued Venezuela-related General License (GL) 40A, which authorizes certain transactions involving the exportation or reexportation of liquefied petroleum gas to Venezuela that would otherwise be prohibited by Executive Order (E.O.) 13884, as incorporated into the Venezuela Sanctions Regulations. (Covered by InfoBytes here.) Effective July 7, G.L. 40A replaces G.L. 40, which was issued in July 2021.
OFAC issues Notification of Blocked Property to sanctioned Russian oligarch’s trust
On June 30, the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued a Notification of Blocked Property to a Delaware-based trust in which an OFAC-designated Russian oligarch holds a property interest. As previously covered by InfoBytes, in April 2018, OFAC sanctioned seven Russian oligarchs, including the Russian oligarch who holds a property interest, along with 12 companies they own or control, 17 senior Russian government officials, and a state-owned Russian weapons trading company and its Russian bank subsidiary pursuant to the Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act of 2017 (CAATSA) and Executive Orders 13661, 13662, and 13582. According to OFAC, the trust holds assets valued at over $1 billion; therefore, this enforcement action ensures that those assets continue to be blocked and inaccessible to the OFAC-designated Russian oligarch. As a result of the Notification of Blocked Property, the trust is subject to the same prohibitions applicable to the OFAC-designated Russian oligarch. All transactions by U.S. persons or within (or transiting) the U.S. involving any property or interests in property of designated or otherwise blocked persons are prohibited, unless exempt or authorized by a general or specific license issued by OFAC. These prohibitions include the making of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services by, to, or for the benefit of any blocked person and the receipt of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services from any such person.
OFAC amends Global Terrorism Sanctions Regulations
On June 30, the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) announced a final rule amending the Global Terrorism Sanctions Regulations. Specifically, the final rule “authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury to prohibit the opening, and prohibit or impose strict conditions on the maintaining, in the United States, of a correspondent account or payable-through account of any foreign financial institution that the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, has determined, on or after September 24, 2001 (the effective date of amended E.O. 13224), has knowingly conducted or facilitated any significant transaction on behalf of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to amended E.O. 13224.” The final rule is effective July 1.
OFAC sanctions nearly 100 Russian targets; prohibits Russian gold imports
On June 28, the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) announced sanctions pursuant to Executive Orders (E.O.) 14024 and 14065 against 70 entities—many of which, according to OFAC, “are critical to the Russian Federation’s defense industrial base, including State Corporation Rostec, the cornerstone of Russia’s defense, industrial, technology, and manufacturing sector.” Twenty-nine Russian individuals were also designated. “We once again reaffirm our commitment to working alongside our partners and allies to impose additional severe sanctions in response to Russia’s war against Ukraine,” Treasury Secretary Janet L. Yellen said. OFAC’s designations occurred in tandem with actions taken by the U.S. State Department, which include sanctions against an additional 45 entities and 29 individuals as well as visa restrictions against “officials believed to have threatened or violated Ukraine’s sovereignty, territorial integrity, or political independence.” Additionally, OFAC immediately prohibited the importation of Russian gold into the U.S. (unless licensed or otherwise authorized by OFAC). As a result of the sanctions, all property and interests in property belonging to the designated persons in the U.S. are blocked and must be reported to OFAC. Additionally, “any entities that are owned, directly or indirectly, 50 percent or more by one or more blocked persons are also blocked.” OFAC noted that U.S. persons are prohibited from participating in transactions with the sanctioned persons unless authorized by a general or specific license.
A joint alert issued by FinCEN and the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security also urged financial institutions to remain vigilant against Russian and Belarusian export control evasion and to take a “risk-based approach” for identifying potentially suspicious activity, such as end-use certificates, export documents, or letters of credit-based trade financing. “Financial institutions and the private sector continue to play a key role in disrupting Russia’s efforts to acquire critical goods and technology to support its war-making efforts,” OFAC stated in its announcement.
On the same day, OFAC issued several new Russia-related general licenses (GL): (i) GL 39 authorizes the wind down of transactions ordinarily incident and necessary involving State Corporation Rostec that are normally prohibited by E.O. 14024; (ii) GL 40 authorizes “all transactions ordinarily incident and necessary to the provision, exportation, or reexportation of goods, technology, or services to ensure the safety of civil aviation involving one or more of” certain blocked entities; (iii) GL 41 authorizes certain transactions related to agricultural equipment that are normally prohibited by the Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations; (iv) GL 42 authorizes certain transactions with the Federal Security Services; and (v) GL 43 authorizes the divestment or transfer of debt or equity of, and wind down of derivative contracts involving the Public Joint Stock Company Severstal or Nord Gold PLC.
OFAC also published a Determination Pursuant to Section 1(a)(i) of Executive Order 14068 concerning prohibitions related to the importation of Russian gold and issued one new and one amended frequently asked question.
The Russian Elites, Proxies, and Oligarchs (REPO) Task Force also issued a joint statement summarizing actions taken by REPO members against sanctioned Russians. The efforts have led to more than $30 billion worth of sanctioned Russians’ assets being blocked or frozen and has heavily restricted sanctioned Russians’ access to the international financial system.
OFAC sanctions Iranian petrochemical producers and other supporting entities
On June 16, the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) announced sanctions against a network of Iranian petrochemical producers, as well as front companies in the People’s Republic of China (PRC) and the United Arab Emirates (UAE), for supporting two entities connected to the sale of Iranian petrochemicals abroad. According to OFAC, the designated network "helps effectuate international transactions and evade sanctions, supporting the sale of Iranian petrochemical products to customers in the PRC and the rest of East Asia.” As a result, all property and interests in property of the sanctioned persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction are blocked, as well as any entities owned 50 percent or more by such persons. U.S. persons are also generally prohibited from entering into transactions with the sanctioned persons. Additionally, OFAC warned that “any foreign financial institution that knowingly facilitates a significant transaction for any of the individuals or entities designated today could be subject to U.S. sanctions.”