Skip to main content
Menu Icon
Close

InfoBytes Blog

Financial Services Law Insights and Observations

Filter

Subscribe to our InfoBytes Blog weekly newsletter and other publications for news affecting the financial services industry.

  • OFAC settles with bank for alleged Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Sanctions Regulations violations

    Financial Crimes

    On July 15, the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) announced a $430,500 settlement with a subsidiary of a national bank for allegedly processing transactions in violation of the Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Sanctions Regulations. According to OFAC’s web notice, between May 2018 and July 2018, the bank allegedly processed 214 transactions totaling $155,189, in violation of OFAC’s Kingpin sanctions. Specifically, OFAC noted that the processed transactions were for an account whose supplemental card holder was designated in connection with illegal drug distribution and money laundering.

    In arriving at the settlement amount of $430,500, OFAC considered various aggravating factors, including that the bank “is a large and sophisticated financial institution with a global presence,” and “conferred $155,189.42 in economic benefit to an account associated with a [person] who was designated for involvement in illegal drug distribution and money laundering.” OFAC also considered various mitigating factors, including that the bank cooperated with OFAC throughout the investigation, and has undertaken remedial measures intended to minimize the risk of recurrence of similar conduct.

    Financial Crimes Of Interest to Non-US Persons Department of Treasury Settlement Anti-Money Laundering OFAC OFAC Sanctions OFAC Designations Enforcement

  • Treasury clarifies impact of sanctions on agricultural commodities, agricultural equipment, or medicine relating to Russia

    Financial Crimes

    On July 14, the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued a Fact Sheet to clarify that the U.S. has not imposed sanctions on the production, manufacturing, sale, or transport of agricultural commodities, agricultural equipment, or medicine relating to Russia. Additionally, OFAC issued General License (GL) 6B to expand agricultural and medical authorizations to now cover transactions related to agricultural equipment that would normally be prohibited by the Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations. OFAC emphasized that U.S. sanctions on Russia issued in response to its war against Ukraine “do not stand in the way of agricultural and medical trade.” OFAC referred to guidance issued in April for more details on authorizations under U.S. sanctions related to agricultural and medical transactions, nongovernmental organization activities, and Covid-19 relief, among others, to support people impacted by Russia’s war (covered by InfoBytes here).

    Financial Crimes Of Interest to Non-US Persons Department of Treasury OFAC OFAC Sanctions OFAC Designations Russia Ukraine Ukraine Invasion

  • OFAC sanctions Mexican cartel facilitator

    Financial Crimes

    On July 11, the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) announced sanctions pursuant to the Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Designation Act against an individual engaged in the trafficking of high-caliber firearms from the U.S. to a Mexican drug organization. According to OFAC, the designated individual acted for or on behalf of a violent drug trafficking organization based in Mexico, which is responsible for a significant proportion of drugs trafficked into the U.S. OFAC further noted that the designation “is the result of ongoing efforts by U.S. agencies and the Government of Mexico to disrupt Mexican drug trafficking organizations’ procurement of weapons, including those sourced in the United States.” As a result of the sanctions, all property belonging to the sanctioned persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction are blocked and must be reported to OFAC. U.S. persons are also generally prohibited from engaging in any dealings involving the property of blocked or designated persons.

    Financial Crimes OFAC Department of Treasury Of Interest to Non-US Persons SDN List OFAC Sanctions OFAC Designations Mexico

  • Agencies release customer relationship and due diligence guidance

    On July 6, the FDIC, Federal Reserve Board, FinCEN, NCUA, and OCC issued a joint statement concerning banks’ risk-based approach for assessing customer relationships and conducting customer due diligence (CDD). Specifically, the joint statement reinforces the agencies’ “longstanding position that no customer type presents a single level of uniform risk or a particular risk profile related to money laundering (ML), terrorist financing (TF), or other illicit financial activity.” Banks are reminded that they must apply a risk-based approach to CDD and adopt appropriate risk-based procedures for conducting ongoing CDD when developing risk profiles of their customers. Because customer relationships present varying levels of ML, TF, and other illicit financial activity risks, the agencies advised banks to, among other things, (i) understand the nature and purpose of customer relationships; and (ii) “conduct ongoing monitoring to identify and report suspicious transactions and, on a risk basis, to maintain and update customer information.”

    Additionally, banks that comply with applicable Bank Secrecy Act/anti-money laundering (BSA/AML) legal and regulatory requirements and effectively manage and mitigate risks related to the unique characteristics of customer relationships, “are neither prohibited nor discouraged from providing banking services to customers of any specific class or type,” the agencies said, adding that “as a general matter” they will not direct banks to open, close, or maintain specific accounts as they “recognize that banks choose whether to enter into or maintain business relationships based on their business objectives and other relevant factors, such as the products and services sought by the customer, the geographic locations where the customer will conduct or transact business, and banks’ ability to manage risks effectively.” Banks are encouraged “to manage customer relationships and mitigate risks based on customer relationships, rather than decline to provide banking services to entire categories of customers.”

    The joint statement is applicable to all customer types referenced in the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) BSA/AML Examination Manual, as well as to those not specifically addressed in the manual. These include “independent automated teller machine owners or operators, nonresident aliens and foreign individuals, charities and nonprofit organizations, professional service providers, cash intensive businesses, nonbank financial institutions, and customers the bank considers politically exposed persons.” The agencies reiterated that the joint statement does not alter existing BSA/AML legal or regulatory requirements, nor does it establish new supervisory expectations. Moreover, the FFIEC BSA/AML Examination Manual does not establish requirements for banks, nor should the inclusion of sections on specific customer types be interpreted as a signal that certain customer types present uniformly higher risk.

    Bank Regulatory Financial Crimes Federal Issues Agency Rule-Making & Guidance Federal Reserve FDIC OCC NCUA FinCEN Risk Management Customer Due Diligence Terrorist Financing Illicit Finance FFIEC Of Interest to Non-US Persons

  • OFAC sanctions Iranian petrochemical network

    Financial Crimes

    On July 6, the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) announced sanctions pursuant to Executive Order 13846 against an international network of individuals and entities for facilitating the delivery and sale of hundreds of millions of dollars’ worth of Iranian petroleum and petrochemical products from Iranian companies to East Asia through a web of Gulf-based front companies. The designations follow OFAC sanctions announced June 16 against a network of Iranian petrochemical producers, as well as front companies in the People’s Republic of China and the United Arab Emirates, working to support Iranian petrochemical sales (covered by InfoBytes here). As a result, all property and interests in property of the sanctioned persons subject to U.S. jurisdiction are blocked and must be reported to OFAC, as well as any entities owned 50 percent or more by such persons. U.S. persons are also generally prohibited from entering into transactions with the sanctioned persons. Additionally, OFAC warned that “any foreign financial institution that knowingly facilitates a significant transaction for any of the individuals or entities designated today could be subject to U.S. sanctions.”

    Financial Crimes OFAC Department of Treasury Of Interest to Non-US Persons OFAC Sanctions OFAC Designations Iran China SDN List

  • OFAC amends Venezuela-related general license

    Financial Crimes

    On July 7, the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control issued Venezuela-related General License (GL) 40A, which authorizes certain transactions involving the exportation or reexportation of liquefied petroleum gas to Venezuela that would otherwise be prohibited by Executive Order (E.O.) 13884, as incorporated into the Venezuela Sanctions Regulations. (Covered by InfoBytes here.) Effective July 7, G.L. 40A replaces G.L. 40, which was issued in July 2021.

    Financial Crimes OFAC Department of Treasury Of Interest to Non-US Persons Venezuela OFAC Sanctions OFAC Designations

  • OFAC issues Notification of Blocked Property to sanctioned Russian oligarch’s trust

    Financial Crimes

    On June 30, the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) issued a Notification of Blocked Property to a Delaware-based trust in which an OFAC-designated Russian oligarch holds a property interest. As previously covered by InfoBytes, in April 2018, OFAC sanctioned seven Russian oligarchs, including the Russian oligarch who holds a property interest, along with 12 companies they own or control, 17 senior Russian government officials, and a state-owned Russian weapons trading company and its Russian bank subsidiary pursuant to the Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act of 2017 (CAATSA) and Executive Orders 1366113662, and 13582. According to OFAC, the trust holds assets valued at over $1 billion; therefore, this enforcement action ensures that those assets continue to be blocked and inaccessible to the OFAC-designated Russian oligarch. As a result of the Notification of Blocked Property, the trust is subject to the same prohibitions applicable to the OFAC-designated Russian oligarch. All transactions by U.S. persons or within (or transiting) the U.S. involving any property or interests in property of designated or otherwise blocked persons are prohibited, unless exempt or authorized by a general or specific license issued by OFAC. These prohibitions include the making of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services by, to, or for the benefit of any blocked person and the receipt of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services from any such person.

    Financial Crimes Department of Treasury OFAC OFAC Sanctions OFAC Designations Russia Of Interest to Non-US Persons CAATSA

  • OFAC amends Global Terrorism Sanctions Regulations

    Financial Crimes

    On June 30, the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) announced a final rule amending the Global Terrorism Sanctions Regulations. Specifically, the final rule “authorizes the Secretary of the Treasury to prohibit the opening, and prohibit or impose strict conditions on the maintaining, in the United States, of a correspondent account or payable-through account of any foreign financial institution that the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, has determined, on or after September 24, 2001 (the effective date of amended E.O. 13224), has knowingly conducted or facilitated any significant transaction on behalf of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to amended E.O. 13224.” The final rule is effective July 1.

    Financial Crimes OFAC Federal Register Of Interest to Non-US Persons Department of Treasury OFAC Sanctions

  • OFAC sanctions nearly 100 Russian targets; prohibits Russian gold imports

    Financial Crimes

    On June 28, the U.S. Treasury Department’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) announced sanctions pursuant to Executive Orders (E.O.) 14024 and 14065 against 70 entities—many of which, according to OFAC, “are critical to the Russian Federation’s defense industrial base, including State Corporation Rostec, the cornerstone of Russia’s defense, industrial, technology, and manufacturing sector.” Twenty-nine Russian individuals were also designated. “We once again reaffirm our commitment to working alongside our partners and allies to impose additional severe sanctions in response to Russia’s war against Ukraine,” Treasury Secretary Janet L. Yellen said. OFAC’s designations occurred in tandem with actions taken by the U.S. State Department, which include sanctions against an additional 45 entities and 29 individuals as well as visa restrictions against “officials believed to have threatened or violated Ukraine’s sovereignty, territorial integrity, or political independence.” Additionally, OFAC immediately prohibited the importation of Russian gold into the U.S. (unless licensed or otherwise authorized by OFAC). As a result of the sanctions, all property and interests in property belonging to the designated persons in the U.S. are blocked and must be reported to OFAC. Additionally, “any entities that are owned, directly or indirectly, 50 percent or more by one or more blocked persons are also blocked.” OFAC noted that U.S. persons are prohibited from participating in transactions with the sanctioned persons unless authorized by a general or specific license.

    A joint alert issued by FinCEN and the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security also urged financial institutions to remain vigilant against Russian and Belarusian export control evasion and to take a “risk-based approach” for identifying potentially suspicious activity, such as end-use certificates, export documents, or letters of credit-based trade financing. “Financial institutions and the private sector continue to play a key role in disrupting Russia’s efforts to acquire critical goods and technology to support its war-making efforts,” OFAC stated in its announcement.

    On the same day, OFAC issued several new Russia-related general licenses (GL): (i) GL 39 authorizes the wind down of transactions ordinarily incident and necessary involving State Corporation Rostec that are normally prohibited by E.O. 14024; (ii) GL 40 authorizes “all transactions ordinarily incident and necessary to the provision, exportation, or reexportation of goods, technology, or services to ensure the safety of civil aviation involving one or more of” certain blocked entities; (iii) GL 41 authorizes certain transactions related to agricultural equipment that are normally prohibited by the Russian Harmful Foreign Activities Sanctions Regulations; (iv) GL 42 authorizes certain transactions with the Federal Security Services; and (v) GL 43 authorizes the divestment or transfer of debt or equity of, and wind down of derivative contracts involving the Public Joint Stock Company Severstal or Nord Gold PLC.

    OFAC also published a Determination Pursuant to Section 1(a)(i) of Executive Order 14068 concerning prohibitions related to the importation of Russian gold and issued one new and one amended frequently asked question.

    The Russian Elites, Proxies, and Oligarchs (REPO) Task Force also issued a joint statement summarizing actions taken by REPO members against sanctioned Russians. The efforts have led to more than $30 billion worth of sanctioned Russians’ assets being blocked or frozen and has heavily restricted sanctioned Russians’ access to the international financial system.

    Financial Crimes Of Interest to Non-US Persons Department of Treasury OFAC OFAC Designations OFAC Sanctions Russia Ukraine Ukraine Invasion Department of State FinCEN Department of Commerce

  • FinCEN issues statement on independent ATM customer due diligence

    Financial Crimes

    On June 22, FinCEN issued a statement providing clarity to banks on the application of a risk-based approach to conducting customer due diligence (CDD) on independent Automated Teller Machine (ATM) owners or operators, consistent with FinCEN’s 2016 CDD Rule. As previously covered by InfoBytes, FinCEN issued a final rule imposing standardized CDD requirements for banks, broker-dealers, mutual funds, futures commission’s merchants, and brokers in commodities in May 2016. The rule established that covered institutions must identify any natural person that owns, directly or indirectly, 25 percent or more of a legal entity customer or that exercises control over the entity. The rule also established ongoing monitoring for reporting suspicious transactions and, on a risk basis, updating customer information. The recently released statement explained that the level of money laundering and terrorism financing risk varies with these customers, and that they do not automatically present a higher level of risk. FinCEN pointed to certain customer information that may be useful for banks in making determinations on the risk profile of independent ATM owner or operator customers, including, among other things: (i) organizational structure and management; (ii) operating policies, procedures, and internal controls; (iii) currency servicing arrangements; (iv) source of funds if a bank account is not used to replenish the ATM; and (v) description of expected and actual ATM activity levels.

    Financial Crimes Agency Rule-Making & Guidance FinCEN Customer Due Diligence ATM Terrorist Financing

Pages

Upcoming Events