InfoBytes Blog
Filter
Subscribe to our InfoBytes Blog weekly newsletter and other publications for news affecting the financial services industry.
Hsu says OCC focused on fairness in banking
On March 30, acting Comptroller of the Currency Michael J. Hsu commented that the safety and soundness of the federal banking system continues to be a top agency priority, as is improving fairness in banking. Speaking at a conference, Hsu discussed several measures taken by the OCC to elevate and advance fairness, particularly for the underserved and financially vulnerable. Explaining that OCC examiners are encouraging bank management to review existing overdraft protection programs and consider adopting pro-consumer reforms, Hsu referred to CFPB guidance issued last October to address unfair, deceptive, and abusive practices associated with “so-called ‘surprise overdraft’ fees.” (Covered by InfoBytes here.) He also commented that both the Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC have cited the risk of violating UDAP in connection with the certain overdraft practices. Hsu noted that not all overdraft practices are equal, stating that “authorize positive, settle negative” and “representment” fees both present heightened risks.
Recognizing the recent decline in banks’ reliance on overdraft fees, Hsu emphasized that most bankers he has spoken to “understand the importance of treating their customers fairly and have been open to learning about best practices.” He noted that “[t]hese bankers are committed to being there for their customers and providing them with short-term, small dollar liquidity when it is needed most. Many customers tell their banks, as well as groups that have studied overdraft practices, that this banking service helps them meet payments when they come due.” Hsu added that the OCC’s intended goal is to “improve the fairness of these programs by making them more pro-consumer, not to eliminate them,” and that “[m]ore fairness means more financially healthy communities, which means more trust in banking.” Hsu also discussed efforts taken by the OCC to combat discriminatory lending practices, including working to enhance supervisory methods for identifying appraisal discrimination.
FDIC announces Arkansas and Mississippi disaster relief
On April 5, the FDIC issued FIL-14-2023 to provide regulatory relief to financial institutions and help facilitate recovery in areas of Arkansas affected by severe storms and tornadoes on March 31. The FDIC acknowledged the unusual circumstances faced by institutions affected by the storms and encouraged institutions to work with impacted borrowers to, among other things: (i) extend repayment terms; (ii) restructure existing loans; or (iii) ease terms for new loans, provided the measures are done “in a manner consistent with sound banking practices.” Additionally, the FDIC noted that institutions “may receive favorable Community Reinvestment Act consideration for community development loans, investments, and services in support of disaster recovery.” The FDIC will also consider regulatory relief from certain filing and publishing requirements and instructs institutions to contact the Dallas Regional Office for consideration. Earlier, on March 30, the FDIC issued FIL-12-2023 to provide similar regulatory relief to financial institutions and help facilitate recovery in areas of Mississippi affected by severe storms, straight-line winds, and tornadoes on March 24 and 25.
OCC establishes Office of Financial Technology
On March 30, the OCC announced the establishment of the Office of Financial Technology, and selected Prashant Bhardwaj to lead the office as Deputy Comptroller and Chief Financial Technology Officer beginning April 10. As previously covered by InfoBytes, last October the OCC said the new office will build on and incorporate the agency’s Office of Innovation (established in 2016 and covered by InfoBytes here), and will strengthen the OCC’s expertise and ability to adapt to a rapidly evolving banking landscape. The Office of Financial Technology will “enhance the OCC’s expertise on matters regarding digital assets, fintech partnerships, and other changing technologies and business models within and that affect OCC-supervised banks,” the OCC said in its announcement, noting that Bhardwaj will lead a team responsible for analyzing, evaluating, and discussing relevant fintech trends, emerging and potential risks, and the potential implications for OCC supervision.
CFPB finalizes Section 1071 rule on small business lending data
On March 30, the CFPB released its final rule implementing Section 1071 of the Dodd-Frank Act. Consistent with Section 1071, the final rule will require financial institutions to collect and provide to the Bureau data on lending to small businesses, defined as an entity with gross revenue under $5 million in its last fiscal year, which the Bureau will ultimately publish. (See also an executive summary here.)
As explained in a corresponding fact sheet, the final rule is intended to foster transparency and accountability by requiring financial institutions—both traditional banks and credit unions, as well as non-banks—to collect and disclose data about small business loan recipients’ race, ethnicity, and gender, as well as geographic information, lending decisions, and credit pricing. The credit application information will be compiled in a comprehensive, publicly available database to help policymakers, borrowers, and lenders better address economic development needs and adapt to future challenges. The final rule also contains a sample data collection form that lenders can, but are not required to, use to collect applicants’ demographic data, and while small businesses are given the option not to provide this information, lenders must not discourage applicants from supplying this data (as explained in more detail in an accompanying policy statement). The Bureau also released a report detailing user testing research used to learn about lenders’ likely experience in filling out the sample data collection form, as well as a report describing the agency’s methodology for estimating how many lenders will be required to report under the final rule and for producing cost estimates associated with implementing the final rule.
The final rule contains important changes from the proposed rule issued in September 2021 (covered by a Special Alert here). Explaining that these changes are designed to make the final rule more effective and easier to follow, the Bureau stated that larger lenders will be required to collect and report data earlier than small lenders. The reporting requirements begin once a lender originates at least 100 covered small business loans in each of the two prior calendar years—a threshold that “accounts for more than 95 percent of small-business loans by banks and credit unions,” the Bureau said in its press release, noting that it was raised from the originally proposed 25-loans-per-year threshold.
While the final rule is effective 90 days after publication in the Federal Register, lenders will follow a tiered compliance date structure:
- Lenders that originate at least 2,500 covered small business loans in both 2022 and 2023, must begin collecting data on October 1, 2024.
- Lenders that originate at least 500 covered small business loans in both 2022 and 2023, must begin collecting data on April 1, 2025.
- Lenders that originate at least 100 covered small business loans in both 2022 and 2023 must begin collecting data on January 1, 2026.
- Lenders that did not originate at least 100 covered small business loans in both 2022 and 2023, but subsequently originated at least 100 transactions in two consecutive calendar years may begin collecting data no earlier than January 1, 2026.
- Lenders that originate between 100 and 500 small business loans in both 2024 and 2025, must begin collecting data on January 1, 2026.
Other changes from the proposal include allowing applicants to self-identify demographic information, including race and ethnicity, rather than requiring loan officers to make the determination. The final rule also now includes an exclusion for mortgage loans that must be reported under HMDA, and suggests that under the federal regulators’ forthcoming Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) reporting requirements, data submitted under the Bureau’s final rule will satisfy relevant CRA requirements. Additionally, financial institutions and other third parties will be allowed to develop services and technologies to assist lenders with collecting and reporting data. The Bureau noted that it is working on a supplementary proposal that would, if finalized, give more compliance time for small lenders that are already successful in meeting the needs of the local communities they serve.
CFPB Director Rohit Chopra commented that the final rule’s impact “will be in the comprehensive data that it produces, which can be used by lenders, borrowers, and the broader public to achieve better credit outcomes for small businesses and communities across the country.”
FHFA expands deferral policies for hardships
On March 29, FHFA announced enhanced payment deferral policies for borrowers facing financial hardships. Under the newly enhanced policies, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will allow borrowers to defer up to six months of mortgage payments, enabling borrowers “to keep the same monthly mortgage payment by moving past-due amounts to the end of the loan as a non-interest bearing balance, due and payable at maturity, sale, refinance, or payoff.” Fannie and Freddie will work with servicers to implement the enhanced payment deferral policies, which carry a voluntary adoption date of July 1, and a mandatory adoption date of October 1.
Recognizing that the more than one million Covid-19 payment deferrals completed by Fannie and Freddie during the pandemic helped borrowers stay in their homes, FHFA Director Sandra L. Thompson said the agency is making the payment deferral policies a key part of its standard loss mitigation toolkit that is available to all borrowers with eligible hardships.
HUD announces Mississippi disaster relief
On March 28, HUD announced disaster assistance for areas in Mississippi impacted by severe storms, straight-line winds, and tornadoes beginning March 24 to March 25. The disaster assistance follows President Biden’s major disaster declaration on March 26. According to the announcement, HUD is providing immediate foreclosure relief, making various FHA mortgage insurance available to disaster victims, and providing information on housing providers, as well as HUD-approved housing counseling agencies, among other measures. Specifically, HUD is providing an automatic 90-day moratorium on foreclosures of FHA-insured home mortgages for covered properties, as well as a 90-day extension granted automatically for home equity conversion mortgages, effective March 26. It is also making various FHA insurance options available to victims whose homes require repairs or were destroyed or severely damaged. HUD’s Section 203(h) program allows borrowers from participating FHA-approved lenders to obtain 100 percent financing, including closing costs, for homes that require “reconstruction or complete replacement.” HUD’s Section 203(k) loan program enables individuals to finance the repair of their existing homes or to include repair costs in the finance of a home purchase or a refinance of a home through a single mortgage. HUD is also allowing administrative flexibilities to community planning and development grantees, as well as to public housing agencies and Tribes.
FDIC orders neobank to stop fraudulent deposit insurance representations
On March 27, the FDIC sent a letter to a neobank demanding that it stop making false or misleading representations about FDIC deposit insurance and take immediate corrective action to address these statements. The FDIC maintained that the neobank and/or its officers made false and misleading statements in English and Spanish suggesting that it is FDIC-insured and that FDIC insurance will protect customers’ cryptocurrency assets. The FDIC explained in the letter that not only is the neobank not FDIC-insured, the FDIC does not insure crypto assets. “By not distinguishing between US-dollar deposits and crypto assets, the statements imply FDIC insurance coverage applies to all customer funds (including crypto assets),” the letter said. Moreover, the neobank also failed to “clearly and conspicuously identify an insured deposit institution for placement of deposits,” the FDIC said in its announcement. Under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, the announcement added, persons are prohibited “from representing or implying that an uninsured product is FDIC-insured or from knowingly misrepresenting the extent and manner of deposit insurance.” The FDIC requested a response within 15 days.
CFPB: TILA does not preempt state commercial financial disclosures
On March 28, the CFPB issued a determination that state disclosure laws covering lending to businesses in California, New York, Utah, and Virginia are not preempted by TILA. The preemption determination confirms a preliminary determination issued by the Bureau in December, in which the agency concluded that the states’ statutes regulate commercial financing transactions and not consumer-purpose transactions (covered by InfoBytes here). The Bureau explained that a number of states have recently enacted laws requiring improved disclosure of information contained in commercial financing transactions, including loans to small businesses. A written request was sent to the Bureau requesting a preemption determination involving certain disclosure provisions in TILA. While Congress expressly granted the Bureau authority to evaluate whether any inconsistencies exist between certain TILA provisions and state laws and to make a preemption determination, the statute’s implementing regulations require the agency to request public comments before making a final determination. In making its preliminary determination last December, the Bureau concluded that the state and federal laws do not appear “contradictory” for preemption purposes, and that “differences between the New York and Federal disclosure requirements do not frustrate these purposes because lenders are not required to provide the New York disclosures to consumers seeking consumer credit.”
After considering public comments following the preliminary determination, the Bureau again concluded that “[s]tates have broad authority to establish their own protections for their residents, both within and outside the scope of [TILA].” In affirming that the states’ commercial financing disclosure laws do not conflict with TILA, the Bureau emphasized that “commercial financing transactions to businesses—and any disclosures associated with such transactions—are beyond the scope of TILA’s statutory purposes, which concern consumer credit.”
SEC proposes to expand EDGAR filings
On March 22, the SEC proposed amendments intended to “modernize” filing procedures through the use of electronic filings on EDGAR using structured data as appropriate. (See also SEC fact sheet here.) Currently, registrants must submit many forms required by the Securities Exchange Act, as well as other materials and submissions, in paper form. The proposed rule would require covered self-regulatory organizations (SROs) to submit these filings electronically, and would apply to national securities exchanges, national securities associations, clearing agencies, broker-dealers, security-based swap dealers, and major security-based swap participants. The proposed rule also would require SROs to make certain submissions in a structured, machine-readable data language, and would amend certain provisions regarding the Financial and Operational Combined Uniform Single Report to harmonize it with other rules, make technical corrections, and provide clarifications. Additionally, the announcement noted that the proposed rule would require, in certain circumstances, withdrawal of notices “filed in connection with an exception to counting certain dealing transactions toward determining whether a person is a security-based swap dealer.” Comments on the proposed rule will be accepted 30 days after publication in the Federal Register or until May 22, whichever is later.
FTC to ban auto warranty operation
On March 24, the FTC announced that a Florida-based group of operators (defendants) faces a permanent ban from the extended automobile warranty industry and will be barred from any further involvement in outbound telemarketing. As previously covered by InfoBytes, the defendants allegedly violated the FTC Act and the Telemarketing Sales Rule by allegedly engaging in deceptive practices when marketing and selling automobile warranties. According to the FTC, the defendants, among other things, (i) misrepresented their affiliation with consumers’ car dealers or manufacturers; (ii) misrepresented warranty coverage; (iii) falsely promised consumers they could obtain a full refund if they cancelled within 30 days; (iv) used remotely created checks, which are illegal in telemarketing transactions; and (v) placed unsolicited calls to numbers on the do not call registry. The proposed stipulated order for permanent injunction, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, would require the defendants to pay a $6.6 million monetary judgment and would impose a permanent industry ban. However, the monetary judgment is largely suspended based on the defendants’ inability to pay.