InfoBytes Blog
Filter
Subscribe to our InfoBytes Blog weekly newsletter and other publications for news affecting the financial services industry.
Senate Banking Chairman Requests Audits of Community Bank and Credit Union Exam Processes
On February 10, Senator Tim Johnson, Chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, sent a letter to the inspectors general of the Department of Treasury, the Federal Reserve Board, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, and the National Credit Union Administration seeking audits of each agency's exam process for community banks and credit unions. The letter cites community bank and credit union complaints of unclear standards and inconsistent application of policies and procedures. Sen. Johnson asked that the audit review (i) the overall exam process, (ii) examination timelines, and (iii) the ability of an institution to question or appeal exam results. The House Financial Services Committee has been considering legislation, H.R. 3461, that would mandate changes to the examination process. To date, no corresponding bill has been introduced in the Senate.
Agencies Release Guidance on ALLL Estimation Practices for Junior Liens
On January 31, the Federal Reserve Board, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the National Credit Union Administration and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (collectively, the agencies), released joint guidance related to allowance for loan and lease losses (ALLL) estimation practices associated with loans and lines of credit secured by junior leans on one- to four-family residential properties. The guidance reiterates, specifically with regard to junior liens, key concepts included in generally accepted accounting principles and existing ALLL supervisory guidance related to the ALLL estimation practices. The agencies provided the guidance to remind regulated financial institutions to monitor all credit quality indicators relevant to credit portfolios and to follow appropriate risk-management principles in managing junior liens.
FDIC Approves Final Rule Regarding Resolution Plans
On January 17, the FDIC approved a final rule establishing the requirements for submission and content of plans to assist the FDIC in the orderly resolution of insured depository institutions with total assets of at least $50 billion. The rule aims to help mitigate risks presented by insolvency of large and complex institutions by enhancing the FDIC’s ability to reduce losses to the Deposit Insurance Fund and limit disruption to the broader financial system. The $50 billion asset threshold means that thirty-seven institutions currently will be required to submit resolution plans (also known as “living wills”). This final rule follows and amends an interim final rule published in September 2011 (see InfoBytes, September 23, 2011). Some amendments are designed to more closely align the rule with a similar rule issued jointly by FDIC and the Federal Reserve Board in October 2011 to require resolution plans for certain bank holding companies. (See InfoBytes, October 21, 2011). Other changes to the interim final rule address comments submitted by stakeholders, including changes to (i) require plans to identify potential barriers or other material obstacles to an orderly resolution, (ii) allow for recapitalization as a resolution option, and (iii) require the FDIC in its plan review process to consult with a covered institution’s regulator before finding that an institution’s data production capability is unacceptable. Resolution plans will be submitted in phases to address the largest institutions first. For example, the first phase requires covered institutions whose parent company had at least $250 billion of nonbank assets as of November 30, 2011 to submit plans on July 1, 2012. Each covered institution must submit plans annually on the anniversary date of their initial submission.
FDIC Approves Proposal for Large Bank Stress Testing
On January 17, the FDIC approved a proposed rule to implement annual capital-adequacy stress tests for FDIC-insured state nonmember banks and state-chartered savings associations with over $10 billion of total consolidated assets. As of September 30, 2011, there were twenty-three such institutions. Required by the Dodd-Frank Act, the stress tests would assist the FDIC in assessing risk presented by an institution’s capitalization and help ensure the bank’s financial stability. Under the proposal, the FDIC would annually provide covered banks with at least three sets of conditions – baseline, adverse, and severely adverse – that must be used in conducting an annual stress test. The tests would include calculations, for each quarter-end within a defined planning horizon, of the impact on the covered bank’s (i) potential losses, (ii) pre-provision revenues, (iii) loan loss reserves, and (iv) pro forma capital positions, including the impact on capital levels and ratios. Covered banks also would be required to establish an oversight and documentation system to ensure that stress testing procedures are effective. Following a test, a covered bank would be required to submit the results to the FDIC and later release a summary to the public. Under the proposed timeline, each year (i) the FDIC would provide scenarios no later than mid-November, (ii) covered banks would submit their stress test reports by January 5, and (iii) by early April covered banks would publicly release a summary of results. Public comments on the rule will be accepted sixty days following publication of the rule in the Federal Register.