InfoBytes Blog
Filter
Subscribe to our InfoBytes Blog weekly newsletter and other publications for news affecting the financial services industry.
Federal Nonbank Charter Legislation Faces Opposition from State AGs
On October 5, forty-one state attorneys general (state AGs) reasserted their interest in enforcing state laws regulating short-term, small dollar lenders, including payday lenders. The National Association of State Attorneys General sent a letter to the leadership of the U.S. House of Representatives and the U.S. Senate urging them to oppose H.R. 6139, the Consumer Credit Access, Innovation, and Modernization Act. As previously reported, the Act, introduced by Reps. Luetkemeyer (R-MO) and Baca (D-CA), would allow the OCC to establish a federal charter for certain nonbanks. The state AGs charge that H.R. 6139 would preempt state laws governing consumer lending and generally would undermine states’ authority with regard to consumer protection enforcement. The state AGs acknowledge that the bill would allow them to enforce violations of federal law, but argue that state laws designed for local markets would be preempted and the state AGs’ ability to target abuses as they emerge would be impaired. During a July hearing on the legislation, the OCC and the Conference of State Bank Supervisors also expressed opposition to the legislation.
State Regulators Oppose Basel III Capital Requirements
On October 3, the Conference of State Bank Supervisors (CSBS) announced its opposition to the “highly reactionary” approach federal regulators have proposed to implement the Basel III capital accord. Although they support higher levels and improved quality of capital, the state regulators argue that the transaction-level approach proposed by federal regulators is too complex and leaves the financial system susceptible to more volatility. Instead, the state regulators favor an approach based on risk management and the supervisory process. Further, the state regulators charge that the federal proposal, including the proposed specific risk-weighted asset requirements, lack empirical support. The CSBS argues that the proposed standardized risk-weighted assets present a specific challenge to mortgage lending, and in other areas would replace supervisory judgment and institution-specific analysis. The state regulators believe that implementing Basel III as currently proposed will only increase industry costs, limit credit availability, and force industry consolidation.
CFPB Continues Credit Card Enforcement Activity
On October 1, the CFPB announced a coordinated enforcement action taken by federal regulators against a major credit card company and several of its subsidiaries alleged to have violated multiple consumer financial protection laws. According to the CFPB, the investigations conducted by it and other federal regulators and a state regulator revealed that the companies (i) charged illegal late fees, (ii) discriminated on the basis of age in the offering of credit, (iii) engaged in deceptive marketing, and (iv) failed to properly report consumer credit disputes. To resolve the allegations, the companies agreed to enter into several different consent orders. Two orders obtained by the CFPB and a joint CFPB/FDIC order require three of the subsidiaries collectively to refund approximately $85 million to approximately 250,000 customers and pay a cumulative $18 million in civil money penalties. Likewise, the OCC issued a consent order that includes an additional $500,000 penalty, and provides for restitution that overlaps with the broader restitution ordered by the CFPB. Finally, an order obtained by the Federal Reserve Board, requires the company, and certain of its subsidiaries, to pay an additional $9 million penalty. Furthermore, pursuant to the various orders, the companies agreed to undergo an independent audit and implement enhanced compliance systems to address the alleged illegal practices. This is the third public CFPB-led enforcement action aimed at credit card companies, and the first to go beyond allegations regarding ancillary products and resolve alleged violations of the CARD Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act.
OCC Refines Consideration of BSA/AML Examination Findings
On September 28, the OCC issued Bulletin 2012-30 to refine how examiners consider Bank Secrecy Act/Anti-Money Laundering (BSA/AML) examination findings in the FFIEC Uniform Ratings System and the OCC’s risk assessment system for national banks and federal savings associations, and in the Risk Management, Operational Controls, Compliance, and Asset Quality ratings and risk assessment system for federal branches and agencies of foreign banking organizations. To align OCC practices with those of other federal regulators, OCC examiners no longer consider BSA/AML findings when assigning consumer compliance ratings. However, the findings still are considered when assessing overall compliance risk. Additionally, the current practice of considering such findings in the safety and soundness context will continue, and serious compliance deficiencies create a presumption that a bank’s management component rating will be hurt. Similarly, current practices regarding consideration of findings with regard to foreign banks remain applicable.
Federal Regulators Host Webinar on SCRA Compliance
On September 10, federal banking regulators, the CFPB, and the FHFA conducted a webinar on federal servicemember financial protections, recent changes to the Servicemembers' Civil Relief Act (SCRA), and recent changes to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac short sale procedures for servicemembers and loan modification options for servicemembers. The event featured compliance and enforcement updates from the CFPB, the DOJ, and the OCC. Ann Thompson from the CFPB Office of Nonbank Supervision described recent joint agency guidance regarding servicemembers with Permanent Change of Station (PCS) Orders as an extension of the CFPB's mortgage servicing exam procedures. Ms. Thompson explained that the CFPB will look at bank and nonbank servicers' policies and procedures to determine their adequacy for handling servicemembers with PCS orders. If there are deficiencies, the CFPB may take supervisory or enforcement actions to support implementation of the guidance. Eric Halperin from the DOJ's fair lending unit provided an update on enforcement activity and described a recent SCRA enforcement action against a national bank that covered all aspects of SCRA, not just foreclosure protections, as the model for the DOJ moving forward. Finally, Kimberly Hebb from the OCC offered some considerations for institutions seeking to comply with SCRA. She explained that the SCRA compliance process need not stand alone. For example, with regard to the law's rate reduction requirements, compliance steps could be incorporated into existing processes for error resolution. Ms. Hebb also stressed documentation and record keeping, pointing out that while the law does not include a specific record retention requirement, examiners will want to see the full scope of compliance processes documented for use in determining compliance.
OCC Names New Enforcement and Compliance Director
On September 5, the OCC announced the promotion of Ellen M. Warwick to Director for Enforcement and Compliance, responsible for conducting investigations, recommending administrative actions, and litigating enforcement actions. Ms. Warwick previously served as Assistant Director for Enforcement and Compliance and as Assistant Director for Litigation, among other positions with the OCC. She also has been a litigation attorney in private practice, a trial attorney with the DOJ, and a prosecutor in the Essex District Attorney’s Office of Massachusetts.
OCC Proposes Stress Test Reporting Requirements for Large Banks
On August 16, the OCC published a notice that describes the reports and information the OCC proposes to collect to implement the Dodd-Frank Act’s annual stress tests for banks with consolidated assets of $50 billion or more. The information that the OCC proposes to collect includes documentation regarding income statements, balance sheets, capital statements, retail projections, securities, trading risk, counterparty credit risk, operational risk, and pre-provision net revenue. The OCC proposed rules to implement the stress tests earlier this year. A separate notice regarding reports for institutions with consolidated assets between $10 billion and $50 billion will be published at a later date. The OCC is accepting comments on the instant notice through October 15, 2012.
OCC Chief Counsel Announces Retirement
On August 13, OCC Chief Counsel Julie Williams announced her departure from her current position effective September 30, 2012 and her retirement from federal service at the end of 2012. Ms. Williams has been with the OCC for eighteen years and twice served as acting Comptroller. While the agency conducts its search for a permanent replacement for Ms. Williams, Deputy Chief Counsel Daniel Stipano will serve as acting Chief Counsel from October 1, 2012 to December 31, 2012 and Deputy Chief Counsel Karen Solomon will serve from January 1, 2013 through March 31, 2013.
Banking Regulators Extend Comment Period for Three Proposed Capital Rules
On August 8, the Federal Reserve Board, the FDIC, and the OCC announced an extension of the comment period for three proposed regulatory capital rules. The proposed rules were announced in June with a comment period closing September 7, 2012. The regulators are now giving interested parties until October 22, 2012 to submit comments.
OCC and Federal Reserve Board Extend Independent Foreclosure Review Program Deadline
On August 2, the Federal Reserve Board and the OCC announced that the deadline for borrowers to seek review of their mortgage foreclosures under the Independent Foreclosure Review program has been extended to December 31, 2012. Under the program, an eligible borrower can have his or her foreclosure reviewed by independent consultants to determine whether the borrower was financially injured due to errors, misrepresentations, or other deficiencies in the foreclosure process. An injured borrower may be eligible for compensation or other remedies. The program originally was scheduled to close April 30, 2012, but has been extended numerous times over the past year.