InfoBytes Blog
Filter
Subscribe to our InfoBytes Blog weekly newsletter and other publications for news affecting the financial services industry.
Florida suspends mortgage foreclosures and certain evictions for 45 days
On April 2, the Florida governor issued an executive order suspending and tolling any statute providing for (i) a mortgage foreclosure cause of action under Florida law for 45 days and (ii) an eviction cause of action under Florida law solely as it relates to non-payment of rent by residential tenants due to the Covid-19 emergency for 45 days.
SEC announces $450,000 compliance-related whistleblower award
On March 30, the SEC announced a $450,000 award to a whistleblower in an enforcement action. According to the formal order, the whistleblower—who had compliance-related responsibilities at the company at issue in the enforcement action—suffered “unique hardships” after first attempting to report concerns within the company’s internal compliance structure. The whistleblower then reported the information to the SEC following the required 120-day time waiting period, which ultimately provided assistance to the SEC’s investigation and successful enforcement action. The SEC stated in its press release that this is the third whistleblower award given to an individual with compliance or internal audit responsibilities. As of March 30, the SEC has awarded 77 individuals a total of approximately $396 million in whistleblower awards since its first award in 2012.
FCC orders phone companies to deploy STIR/SHAKEN framework
On March 31, the FCC adopted new rules that will require phone companies in the U.S. to deploy STIR/SHAKEN caller ID authentication framework by June 30, 2021. As previously covered by InfoBytes, the STIR/SHAKEN framework addresses “unlawful spoofing by confirming that a call actually comes from the number indicated in the Caller ID, or at least that the call entered the US network through a particular voice service provider or gateway.” FCC Chairman Ajit Pai endorsed the value of widespread implementation, stating the framework will “reduce the effectiveness of illegal spoofing, allow law enforcement to identify bad actors more easily, and help phone companies identify—and even block—calls with illegal spoofed caller ID information before those calls reach their subscribers.” The new rules also contain a further notice of proposed rulemaking, which seeks comments on additional efforts to promote caller ID authentication and implement certain sections of the TRACED Act. Among other things, the TRACED Act—signed into law last December (covered by InfoBytes here)—mandated compliance with STIR/SHAKEN for all voice service providers.
Virginia outlines private student loan provider disclosure requirements
On March 23, the Virginia governor signed HB 743, which outlines disclosure requirements for private student loan providers to follow before issuance of a qualified education loan. The disclosure must contain contact information for the state’s Office of the Qualified Education Loan Ombudsman, as well as “a summary of the student loan information applicable to private education loans.” HB 743 further states that this disclosure may be “made in in conjunction with or incorporated into another disclosure” provided it is sent to a borrower prior to the issuance of a loan. The act takes effect July 1, 2021.
Federal agencies extend Volcker Rule comment period
On April 2, the Federal Reserve Board, CFTC, FDIC, OCC, and SEC (agencies) jointly announced that they would extend the comment period to May 1 on their proposal to modify and streamline the “covered funds” requirements under Section 13 of the Bank Holding Company Act, commonly known as the Volcker Rule. As previously covered by InfoBytes, the proposed amendments would, among other things, clarify the regulations concerning covered funds and address certain related issues, including permitting the activities of qualifying foreign excluded funds. The comment period originally was scheduled to end April 1. However, due to potential disruptions as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic, the agencies agreed to extend the comment deadline to May 1.
OCC, FDIC outline SBA relief programs pursuant to the CARES Act
On April 2, the OCC issued Bulletin 2020-31 and the FDIC issued Financial Institution Letter (FIL) 33-2020 to highlight for banks the SBA-relief programs available pursuant to the CARES Act. The bulletin urges banks to utilize the programs to help small businesses that have been financially impacted by Covid-19, adding that the SBA “is streamlining its eligibility criteria and processes to enable more financial institutions to use these programs for eligible small business borrowers.” The guidance highlights three relief programs, including (i) the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP), which is “an expansion of the SBA’s 7(a) loan program” and provides SBA-guaranteed loans to eligible borrowers; (ii) the Economic Injury Disaster Loan and Loan Advance Program, which is also an expansion of a current SBA program—the disaster assistance loan program—where borrowers may receive a loan of up to $2 million for working capital, and up to $10,000 as an advance that the borrower is not required to repay; and (iii) the Debt Relief Program, which provides 6 months of principal, interest and fees on 7(a) loans already in existence or originated prior to September 27.
Additional information on PPP loans can be found on the SBA website here and on the Treasury Department website here. Information about other SBA resources can be found here, and on the FDIC’s Coronavirus Information page here.
District court dismisses class action overdraft fee claims
On March 31, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois dismissed proposed class action overdraft fee claims brought against a national bank and the national bank’s parent company. The plaintiff argued that the bank unfairly charged him overdraft fees for debit transactions he made using two separate merchant debit cards (known as “decoupled debit cards”) that linked to his bank account. The plaintiff contended that because the bank’s contract language stated it would not charge overdraft fees on “non-recurring” debit transactions, this language should control despite the fact that the decoupled debit cards were not issued by the bank. The plaintiff brought multiple claims against the bank, including “breach of contract, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, unconscionability, conversion, and unjust enrichment.” The bank moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim.
The court first dismissed all claims brought against the national bank’s parent company, saying that the plaintiff combined and conflated the two entities. The court then dismissed with prejudice the plaintiff’s claims against the national bank for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, conversion, and unjust enrichment. The court also dismissed, but without prejudice, the claims against the national bank for breach of contract and unconscionability, although the court noted that the bank’s contract language “only applies to debit cards or access devices that were issued by [the bank], unlike the decoupled debit cards at issue here.”
CFPB issues 2019 Consumer Response Annual Report
On March 31, the CFPB published its Consumer Response Annual Report, providing a review of the Bureau’s complaint process and a description of complaints received from consumers in all 50 states and the District of Columbia between January 1 and December 31, 2019.
According to the report, the Bureau handled approximately 352,400 consumer complaints. Of these complaints, roughly 81 percent were submitted to companies for review and response, 14 percent were referred to other regulatory agencies, and five percent were determined to be incomplete. Report data showed that more than 3,200 companies responded to complaints received by the Bureau, with roughly 7,800 complaints receiving administrative responses. In addition, at the end of 2019, approximately 15,700 complaints were still being reviewed by companies, the report stated. The top products and services—representing approximately 89 percent of all complaints—were credit or consumer reporting, debt collection, credit cards, mortgages, and checking or savings accounts. The Bureau also received complaints related to: (i) student, personal, and payday loans; (ii) money transfers and virtual currency; (iii) vehicle finance; (iv) prepaid cards; (v) credit repair; and (vi) title loans. As reported by the CFPB, the majority of consumers who submitted complaints indicated that they first tried to resolve their issues with the companies.
DOJ reaches $2.47 million settlement to resolve alleged lending violations regarding FHA-insured reverse mortgages
On March 31, the DOJ announced a $2.47 million settlement with an Oklahoma-based mortgage lender in connection with alleged violations of the False Claims Act (FCA) related to an acquired predecessor entity’s origination and underwriting of home equity conversion mortgages (HECM). According to the DOJ, these HECM loans were insured by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) but failed to meet HUD requirements. The DOJ alleged that, prior to May 2, 2010, the predecessor entity ordered appraisals for HECM loans on forms that provided loan amounts and “otherwise improperly communicated certain information to [appraisers] in an attempt to influence the appraised value, in violation of FHA requirements.” The mortgage lender agreed to pay the DOJ $1.97 million to resolve the FCA claims, as well as $500,000 to HUD to resolve administrative liability allegations. The DOJ’s press release noted that the claims “are allegations only, and [that] there has been no determination of liability.”
SEC chair discusses resources allocations, oversight, and rulemaking
On April 2, SEC Chairman Jay Clayton issued a statement outlining the SEC’s approach to its allocation of resources, oversight, and rulemaking agenda. As previously covered by InfoBytes, the SEC issued guidance last month providing temporary relief and assistance to market participants impacted by the Covid-19 pandemic, including relief from certain notarization requirements and filing deadline extensions. Clayton noted, however, that despite these challenges, the SEC recognized that it is imperative that issuers keep investors equipped with material information, and accordingly has urged public companies to “continue to evaluate their obligations to make materially accurate and complete disclosures in accordance with the federal securities laws.” Among other things, Clayton also reiterated that, while public comments closed recently on several proposed rulemaking actions, the SEC will “not take final action on these items in the coming weeks to allow potential commenters more time to submit comments for consideration if needed.” The SEC does not expect to move forward on any of these proposed actions prior to May 1.
Relatedly, Clayton discussed Regulation Best Interest (Reg BI) and Form CRS, which establish new standards of conduct for broker-dealers and related persons when recommending securities transactions or investment strategies to retail customers. Clayton highlighted the extensive engagement efforts related to the implementation of Reg BI and Form CRS, and encouraged continued engagement with investors and other market participants on these regulatory enhancements. Clayton noted that, in light of these engagement efforts, the June 30 compliance date remains appropriate, and provided a number of resources to assist firms in understanding the new requirements and implementation process.